That does not sound very practical.Canon will most likely keep the R8 as a lighter/cheaper R6. That means the same sensor (stacked if R6 gets it)
I do not think stacked sensors are cheap enough yet.
Upvote
0
That does not sound very practical.Canon will most likely keep the R8 as a lighter/cheaper R6. That means the same sensor (stacked if R6 gets it)
I highly doubt that.I wonder if Canon might choose to use the R1 sensor rather than the old R3 one for the R6 iii ?
Needed is a strong word but it would help with the buffer.Why would a CFe type B slot be needed?
It would probably also need a bigger battery or take a huge hit in battery life.They probably need to 'tweak' it to a similar size as the R6 in order to have IBIS, in which case there would be little compactness advantage. (Fuji XT-5, which has IBIS, has a similar size as the R8, but it is for an APSC sensor.) However, if Canon is able to keep to the R8 form factor and build in IBIS, I will be most happy.
The first thing the R8 needs to improve is battery life.I wonder if the R8 series will follow the R6 series or go its own way. Apart from flash-with-ES there isn't much to improve in the R8 for my use case
4k120 raw would need a CFe B card due to the massive file size/bandwidth.The R6ii is a very popular action camera for sports and wildlife and I find I have to be careful not to hit the buffer shooting birds so a CFe B card would be great for me, also these cards aren't much bigger than SD cards and are cheaper to buy than V90 SD cards too, I also shoot 4K 60 fps video and would like to be able to shoot 4K 120
I guess you’re new to photography. If not, it’s sad that you now know your work from several years ago is totally ridiculous, useless trash.For me, 24 MP nowadays it's ridiculous.
24MP gets you a 20" by 30" print at 200 pixels per inch. How often do you need more than that?The first thing that R6 and R8 (beside R8 battery life) need to improve is MP count (and I know this topic is controversial).
For me, 24 MP nowadays it's ridiculous. You carry a full-frame and a 24-70 F2.8 900 gr weight lens to only get 24 MP? It's like carry a Hasselblad for less than 50 or 100 MP, say 24 MP. Ridiculous.
I always shoot cRAW and can't tell any difference from RAW but still hit the buffer sometimes. Time to ditch SD cards entirely I think4k120 raw would need a CFe B card due to the massive file size/bandwidth.
The question is whether Canon would offer raw vs raw light which wouldn't need a CFe card (similar to 8k60 for the R5ii).
Does shooting cRaw provide a better buffer clearing performance on the R6ii? Can your use case show any difference using cRaw vs not?
I'm all for CFe B cards. From my perspective, it now makes sense for dual CFe cards for all high end Canon bodies. The cards are cheap enough to have spares and there would be no issue with dual recording (buffer clearance or video).
Yes, that is what I thought. But Canon could make space for a new line-up:Stacked sensor + CF Express card = expect a price hike.
Not going to happen. Price increase and newer battery that you'll have to buy sure. IBIS likely isn't cheap enough to trickle down yet. Joystick not a chance in hell for the R8 due to strategy/model differentiation.Yes, that is what I thought. But Canon could make space for a new line-up:
R6mkiii --> 3.000 € RP at launch (at least) --> stacked sensor and new tech
R8mkii --> 1.999 € RP at launch (up from 1.799 € --> give it a better battery, IBIS and a joystick, but still lightweight
R9 --> 1.299 € RR at launch - a stripped down FF entry model --> no IBIS, no joystick, good sensor and a very compact, pocketable design. Maybe in the form factor of one these beloved M-line cameras.
Just a wild guess here
Do you have the data that shows Canon is dominating within those segments (mid-range to high end) specifically rather than making a killing with the R100s and R50s?
Canon's behavior (refreshing this line on a 2-2.5 year cycle) does seem to suggest that it's actually a pretty tight segment of the market and they're trying to keep the product competitive.
Nikon forecasts that their interchangeable-lens camera market share this fiscal year will be (850/6100) 14%, so they can't be dominating much of anything.
There is not enough space in the RP/R8 chassis to use an LP-E6 variant, but we might get LP-E19P that will get used in the APS-C models as well. But I wouldn't expect much better battery life, the big improvement for the R6II/R8 came from the updated Digic X using only half the power for video compared to the older model.Yes, that is what I thought. But Canon could make space for a new line-up:
R6mkiii --> 3.000 € RP at launch (at least) --> stacked sensor and new tech
R8mkii --> 1.999 € RP at launch (up from 1.799 € --> give it a better battery, IBIS and a joystick, but still lightweight
R9 --> 1.299 € RR at launch - a stripped down FF entry model --> no IBIS, no joystick, good sensor and a very compact, pocketable design. Maybe in the form factor of one these beloved M-line cameras.
Just a wild guess here
So why Canon R5 have 45 MP, or Sony R series have 60 MP? Are they crazy?24MP gets you a 20" by 30" print at 200 pixels per inch. How often do you need more than that?
I don't understand the people that think that 24 MP it's enough, probably because they have heard it a lot of times.I guess you’re new to photography. If not, it’s sad that you now know your work from several years ago is totally ridiculous, useless trash.
And an inbody flash shouldn't be a bad idea (like Canon Rebel line). It's useful fora 2-3 people photo at night, without the need to carry with an external flash.The first thing the R8 needs to improve is battery life.