Three new segments of EOS R cameras coming in 2025

Which pictures on photonsonphotos. Priceless.

Go back to what I wrote, including the part about delusions and nonsense.
Actual pictures. In the real world. Your inability to read parallels your inability to comprehend the big picture. In more ways than one.

Sensor dynamic range is based on the sensor. The entire sensor. Not one pixel alone. Same for image noise, which is proportional to sensor area, not to pixel size. Photonstophotos uses data from the whole sensor, in aggregate. The same data that are used in generating a picture.

I understand that you’re fixated on the performance of an individual pixel. When you start using a one-pixel camera or cropping all your images to a single pixel, then what you wrote will be relevant. It was somewhat relevant in the days before gapless microlenses, when a higher pixel density resulted in more light lost to the non-photosensitive area of the pixels. But with modern ILC sensors, key image properties such as noise and DR are practically independent of pixel number.

You are free to go living in your personal reality where individual pixel performance matters most and you get to consider those who understand image parameters as delusional. Reality may be beyond your ability to comprehend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
2) NO with C-Log2 you DO NOT even have to use RAW to record or measure full DR.
In order to record full DR in stills, you have to record 14-bit still raw files and analyse them. Not video. The capacity of a container with CLog2 encoding is irrelevant. In video mode, the camera doesn't use 14-bit conversion. ADC conversion happens before any encoding. Full stop, end of story. Your measurements, whatever they are, are absolutely irrelevant for still RAWs.
3) It doesn't matter what.so.ever. is it stills or "video" RAW.
It does because the sensor is in different mode to start with. It's not about the software processing chain. The sensor is physically in different mode. That alone invalidates all your findings.
5) Learn about linear encoding, log encoding and gamma encoding. Rationalising this last part will also help to remove the head scratching about stops above mid grey and avoiding logical errors, sweeping statements and if all works out also delusional beliefs about smaller buckets being as good as larger buckets.
Encoding is irrelevant. I'm talking about raw files which have gamma 1, they're linear. Canon R5 or R5II will have around 3 stops between mid-grey and the highlight clipping level. No amount of encoding can add 3 stops to that. There's simply no raw data for that.
 
Upvote 0
1) This is not camera's dynamic range. This is camera data processed and "normalised to something" which someone calls "photographic range".
You can find both 'engineering' and 'photographic' dynamic range on photostophotos.
'Photographic' is normalised because it's how you'd typically process two images for a target size.
'Engineering' one is per-pixel dynamic range basically.
2) Full camera dynamic range is larger than this.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'full camera dynamic range'.
If the test shows lower range then actual range the differences between camera with lower range and higher will appear smaller. Or be invisible. When looking at some charts and numbers. Further biased by wishful thinking.

4) Anyone who actually bothers to test these cameras side by side instead of regurgitating online numbers void of context and direct experience can nicely see R5 clips sooner then R3 and shadows are poorer then R3.
All Canon R cameras, at least the top end ones, have roughly the same 'highlight headroom' between the metered mid-grey and clipping. It's very easy to verify with a simple test and RawDigger.
5) Basic physics tells you larger bucket can hold more than smaller bucket. Basic math tells you larger largest number divided by smallest number gives a higher number. 7 year old kid can understand this.
Yes. Generally you see more visible noise in smaller pixels when viewing an image 1:1, compared to an image with larger pixels. But when you normalise the images to the same size, you get [roughly] the same visible noise but better resolution with smaller pixels.

That's because you have more smaller buckets per whole sensor. So the total amount of water (light) will be the same.

Enlighten yourself with this thread https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4577990 (note it includes engineers and the actual inventor of CMOS sensor).
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 4 users
Upvote 0
Once again we have links to this web posted as gospel of reality, without clear unerstanding of some concepts and what are figures actually referring to.
What have you presented, other than assertions and rudeness? Are you here merely to demonstrate (to yourself, and seemingly nobody else) your intellectual superiority? Or at least your sense of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
The R1X (or R1S) rumor (80MP, started July 2024, so right after the R1 announcement) is a reclycled rumor from the days when the R1 was supposed to be a high MP camera. The rumor was recycled by “reputable” sources like the Ordinary Film Maker.
So you are not missing anything serious ;).
Has anyone seen this? Dated August 2024.


States Canon is working on a sensor for the R1X.
 
Upvote 0
Has anyone seen this? Dated August 2024.


States Canon is working on a sensor for the R1X.
A statement from the site that used AI (actual idiocy) to predict Canon’s downfall? They fed the algorithm numbers for Canon’s total camera sales from 2021-2022 and just their mirrorless ILC sales for 2023, and ‘AI’ deduced that Canon is doomed, once again proving the adage GIGO (garbage in, garbage out).

I tend to doubt statements from people who’ve shown themselves to be foolish and/or careless. YMMV.
 
Upvote 0
A statement from the site that used AI (actual idiocy) to predict Canon’s downfall? They fed the algorithm numbers for Canon’s total camera sales from 2021-2022 and just their mirrorless ILC sales for 2023, and ‘AI’ deduced that Canon is doomed, once again proving the adage GIGO (garbage in, garbage out).

I tend to doubt statements from people who’ve shown themselves to be foolish and/or careless. YMMV.
And the site has refused to correct the post when that error was made known to them. Clicks are more important than facts.
 
Upvote 0

Attachments

  • SmartSelect_20241119_215601_Samsung Internet.jpg
    SmartSelect_20241119_215601_Samsung Internet.jpg
    732.2 KB · Views: 3
Upvote 0
I saw this yesterday. It's dated August 12, 2024
The point being made is that thenewcamera is not a reputable source.

If you are one of those people who believes everything you read on the Internet, have fun here:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0