We have reported a couple of times that a Canon EOS R6 Mark III could be coming in late 2024. Obviously Canon has a couple of other cameras to manufacture and get in the hands of the hoards of people that want them before an EOS R6 Mark III hits the market.

The EOS R6 Mark II did see a unusual $500 instant rebate in the United States bringing the price down to $1999 for quite some time, but that rebate is now down to $200.

For the moment, a December announcement is the latest possible announcement date that we have been told. Yes, our recent record of announcement dates has been abysmal, but that’s the suggestion we have received.

We do not expect the EOS R6 Mark III information to be locked down in the same way that the EOS R1 and EOS R5 Mark II were.

The 2-year product cycle is likely to continue for the series. It is Canon’s best selling full-frame mirrorless camera and sits in a competitive segment, so it shouldn’t come as a surprise.

Canon has tended to have a run on full-frame camera releases, and then APS-C cameras. It’s not always 100% that way, but we have had early suggestions that the EOS R7 Mark II and EOS R10 Mark II are slated for 2025. However, we don’t have a ton of confidence in anything that we’re hearing about those APS-C cameras.

Early specifications tend to have some inconsistencies, but we have been told that the camera is “pretty much ready to go”

Canon EOS R6 Mark III Specifications (Rumored)

  • 24mp (Related to the stacked EOS R3 sensor)
  • Mechanical shutter / Electronic Shutter
  • No mentions of stills FPS
  • Improved DIGIC X, but no DIGIC Accelerator
  • CFexpress & SD UHS-II card slots
  • 4K 120P
  • FullHD 240P
  • Same EVF as the EOS R5 (So no eye-controlled AF)
  • Improved IBIS performance
  • Improved focus sensitivity
  • Slightly heavier body (Nothing you’re likely to notice)
  • Same 3.0″ LCD size (no mention of resolution)
  • No mention of autofocus capabilities

If the EOS R6 Mark III is announced in late 2024, we would expect availability to come in early 2025.

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

Go to discussion...

223 comments

  1. Canon is pushing out new camera bodies way too quickly. It does make me wonder what is going on behind the scenes. 2 years is a very fast turnover rate for the 6 series.

    I guess they had to do something about the excess 24mp stacked sensors lying around when few are buying the R3. If they were to put that sensor in the R6iii i can see it going up to the $2799-2999 price bracket and still be one of the cheapest cameras with a fully stacked sensor. This also means the R6 and R6ii won\'t depreciate in value, new or used.
  2. Canon is pushing out new camera bodies way too quickly. It does make me wonder what is going on behind the scenes. 2 years is a very fast turnover rate for the 6 series.

    I guess they had to do something about the excess 24mp stacked sensors lying around when few are buying the R3. If they were to put that sensor in the R6iii i can see it going up to the $2799-2999 price bracket and still be one of the cheapest cameras with a fully stacked sensor. This also means the R6 and R6ii won\'t depreciate in value, new or used.

    Too quickly? The EOS R5 follow-up was 4 years, and it was launched alongside the R6. By the time the R1 ships, it'll be 3 years since the R3, which will remain a current model. The R1 also won't be a sales champion.

    2 years is pretty easy to do when it'll be a parts bin camera and much easier for development turnaround. Updating your best selling full-frame camera at a faster pace is a no-brainer.
  3. Canon is pushing out new camera bodies way too quickly. It does make me wonder what is going on behind the scenes. 2 years is a very fast turnover rate for the 6 series.

    I guess they had to do something about the excess 24mp stacked sensors lying around when few are buying the R3. If they were to put that sensor in the R6iii i can see it going up to the $2799-2999 price bracket and still be one of the cheapest cameras with a fully stacked sensor. This also means the R6 and R6ii won\'t depreciate in value, new or used.
    Quickly? I don't think so. R6 has 2-year cycle, R5 — 4-year cycle. Why is it bad? RF mount becomes less expensive on the second market for the sake of those moaners who state it's not affordable.
  4. Quickly? I don't think so. R6 has 2-year cycle, R5 — 4-year cycle. Why is it bad? RF mount becomes less expensive on the second market for the sake of those moaners who state it's not affordable.
    I don't have a problem with the R5. I'm referring to the 6 series. 2 year cycle is very fast. We just got a second generation R5 while R6 is about to get its third.

    And no, RF stuff are not cheap even in the used market. Not in my country at least. A used R6 is still a lot more expensive than a new R8.
  5. I don't have a problem with the R5. I'm referring to the 6 series. 2 year cycle is very fast. We just got a second generation R5 while R6 is about to get its third.

    And no, RF stuff are not cheap even in the used market. Not in my country at least. A used R6 is still a lot more expensive than a new R8.
    R6 is less expensive and more mass-market. It makes money for Canon. On the other hand, competitors don't allow them to relax. It's kinda driving in traffic — you ride at the same speed or you stay still on a shoulder.
  6. I would love to see Digic Accelerator being integrated in this camera. The original R6 shared the same autofocus abilities as the original R5 and, correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t the R6 Mark II feature most of the autofocus abilities of the R3 as well?

    Anyway, this sounds pretty good. I really hope it features a stacked sensor, and that it can shoot 14 bit RAW on electronic shutter. No further requests:D
  7. My request is a BSI sensor to improve rangefinder lenses performance, and finally getting rid of spontaneous freezes. I've never had freezing Canon cameras since 2005 before R6 Mark II.
  8. Tbh I never read much about the R6 Mark II. Is that a frequent issue? The original R6 is definitely very stable.


    I hope its not just another 24 MP
    Read again. We’re talking about a variant of the R3’s sensor.
    You have an alternative with higher resolution, the R5.
  9. Another 24MP full frame camera? While even APS-C cameras are now at 40MP and Sonys direct competitor sits at 33MP. I'd prefer if they sacrificed some speed and gave us 30MP, I'd probably even sell my R5 for that.

    Regarding the 2-years cycle: Yes it's too fast. Canon always had a ~4 year cycle for every model. I don't want to end up in mobile phone cycles where you get a new phone every year with lackluster improvements. But it currently seems that this is where we're heading: Milking the G.A.S.-crowd

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  10. Another 24MP full frame camera? While even APS-C cameras are now at 40MP and Sonys direct competitor sits at 33MP. I'd prefer if they sacrificed some speed and gave us 30MP, I'd probably even sell my R5 for that.

    Regarding the 2-years cycle: Yes it's too fast. Canon always had a ~4 year cycle for every model. I don't want to end up in mobile phone cycles where you get a new phone every year with lackluster improvements. But it currently seems that this is where we're heading: Milking the G.A.S.-crowd ‍♂️

    Canon has had plenty of 2-3 year product cycles in the last decade. There really isn't any sort of pattern outside of the 1 and 5 series.
  11. Another 24MP full frame camera? While even APS-C cameras are now at 40MP and Sonys direct competitor sits at 33MP. I'd prefer if they sacrificed some speed and gave us 30MP, I'd probably even sell my R5 for that.[…]
    I’ve become fond of a useable electronic shutter with the 1/61s readout of the R5 as minimum (or maximum). The 1/31s of the R7 is too slow for my use case, the 1/68s of the R8 being pretty good.

    None of the more-than-24MP APS-C models beat that, so they are uninteresting to me.

    I share your wish for a more-than-24MP camera from Canon that is substantially cheaper than the R5 series. The R7 is close, but its sensor does readout on a glacial scale.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment