Actually, Canon’s DGO mode seems very similar to Arri’s. The key ingredient is that the different gain levels are captured simultaneously. Without this ghosting would appear in all but static shots. Which is why Red’s high dynamic range mode is more of a gimmick.
Then, again, if they'd provided a high-res sensor, the parallax would be reduced proportionately. Just sayin'
too many pixel peeps in the world but with my 120MP R5s? heck yaThen, again, if they'd provided a high-res sensor, the parallax would be reduced proportionately. Just sayin'
A better image is up to the photographer. The ability to capture that better image is up to the camera/lens. In theory, a perfect capture would allow you to not have to worry about those technical aspects while taking the photos. You could then do whatever you wanted in post.
I refer you to this. We do try our best, we don't randomly spout off everything without careful consideration.
Canon Rumors Your best source for Canon news, rumors and more
I originally did this article on CanonNews but talking to Craig about the latest R1 stuff, and whatnot, it seemed like a good idea to update it and redraft it to be more modern. I’m going to keep the initial paragraph the way it was because I think it sets the tone. My thoughts onwww.canonrumors.com
I'd be really interested into learning more about the politics and the situation at Canon
.
I would say camera / lens have a part in capturing better image data, all the rest is up to the photographer.
Learn Japanese, fly to Tokyo, and infiltrate the company HQ.I'd be really interested into learning more about the politics and the situation at Canon
My thoughts exactly. Three years is basically a generation in digital cameras.The R3 came out almost 3 yrs ago, and the A9iii this year. So, you'd hope Sony had made some improvements in that time
If I get it right, DGO implementation in Canon's cinema cameras takes advantage of the dual pixel layout. One sub-pixel is read at a normal gain and another sub-pixel - with a higher gain for shadows. I guess it should work for stills too, but I think it'll also require a bit of additional processing and expansion of raw files to 16-bit depth.
I do not believe that's true. Where are you getting that information? As was pointed out earlier, parallax would be an issue with using the DPAF architecture to drive DGO. The Canon white paper makes no mention of it.
Edit: you're right, in your paper it's explained in more detail on the pages 4 and 5.
