You're two months late.Can we get a compact cinema like the fx3 please. I am still waiting for that Canon.
Please forgive what I"m afraid is a stupid question, but....what does DGO stand for and what does it do?
Thanks in advance,
cayenne
It's not necessary. And would increase the cost of a still camera. DGO isn't merely firmware. It's additional hardware and firmware thus the Cine line. Video in still cameras (hybrid) only increase the price of the still camera.I can’t see any reason why it can’t(stills) go the other way, video is just a compilation of stills. DGO tech should be a piece of cake in stills, IMO. Can you imagine a FF/DX body with DGO tech in it, Canon will probably have 3 modes of dynamic range selection; DR, +DR, wDR(wide). If this BSI stacked is any indication, Canon is not messing around.
You're two months late.The fx3 is not a cinema camera. No nd filters, no shutter angle, no time code, no dci 4k, no true 24 fps, awful screen, etc. You can't just put in extra holes and call it a cinema camera.
And the Sony Venice complete with everything required is not small. And nor is the price. Same goes for the base RED Komodo. Like purchasing an automobile body without wheels and seats inside.I have a lot of criticisms of the Sony cinema line but Venice is a masterpiece.
Nothing is perfect and no user or operator is perfect. Everyone doesn't maintain or treat their equipment equivalent. Even automobiles have a service department.Thanks for your experience.
It sounds like you have had better luck with other cameras.
If Canon were perfect then we would not have so many refurbished deals.
Totally agree. It’s either too overkill or not enough.Can we get a compact cinema like the fx3 please. I am still waiting for that Canon.
Yep readed newshooter explanation one more time . So more wires on sensor ,crazy how these things getting complex.No, it's reading the dual gains at the same time. Nothing to do with global shutter
You mean the c70...?Can we get a compact cinema like the fx3 please. I am still waiting for that Canon.
Unless Canon releases the C400 and C600, then there will never be enough cine-cameras available!I guess the question now: is it possible to upgrade the C300 Mark III and C500 Mark II to the RF-mount (especially useful for the former with the EF-EOS R 0.71x Mount Adapter) or they weren't made to be compatible in the first place, and they are going with either of these new models to push customers towards 8K.
And of course they will also offer the smaller C50, C70 and C90 with the older sensors for those who don't need 8K or don't want to spend more. 6 cinema cameras with the RF-mount (plus the R5 C) are probably more than enough.
The frame rate should be really fast first for imo, as far as my understanding DGO read the sensor twice so probably affordable global shutter still need to be achieved firstI can’t see any reason why it can’t(stills) go the other way, video is just a compilation of stills. DGO tech should be a piece of cake in stills, IMO. Can you imagine a FF/DX body with DGO tech in it, Canon will probably have 3 modes of dynamic range selection; DR, +DR, wDR(wide). If this BSI stacked is any indication, Canon is not messing around.
DGO doesn't read the sensor any more often than DPAF. It reads two diodes per pixel, but as each pixel has half the size and can therefore hold less charge, it also takes less time to read.The frame rate should be really fast first for imo, as far as my understanding DGO read the sensor twice so probably affordable global shutter still need to be achieved first
There is already a C700 GS.Just doesnt go my sense canon giving free lunch like 4000$ C700 global sensor .