Images & Specifications of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Leak Out

rrcphoto said:

pokerz said:

jeffa4444 said:

Seriously all you people troubled by the omission of 4K go buy a video camera. On a tiny sensor like this what kind of a 4K image do you think your going to get?
Gone it seems are the days we buy P&S cameras to take PHOTOGRAPHS no we want to be Hollywood directors instead and if we don't get 4K then hey ho were sulk.

Many Hollywood films are shot on Arri Alexa camera NOT ONE is 4K so they must be inferior!

Click to expand...

Can Arri Alexa camera put into your pocket?
Rx 100 & LX10 do great 4k movie, it kicks 5dm3 1080 CRAPPY movie away.

Click to expand...

actually the RX100 cannot do 4K movie "great"

they even call it 4k "clips" because it's limited to 5 minutes or less.

and the RX100 IV and above are considerably larger than the G9X, and the LX10 even more so.

there's the argument to be made that the G7x and upcoming G3x should have 4k clips of some sort.

however it's dramatically idiotic to think the G9x should considering it's diminutive size.

the three formentioned cameras:

in other words.. Good grief.

Click to expand...

powershot2012 said:

Seriously, you are even trying to put the G9X in the same league as the LX10, let alone the RX100 IV and V???

Now that is funny. :

Click to expand...

pokerz said:

To be fair with Canon, let's compare RX 100 (2012) vs G9x2 (2017)
28-100mm vs 28-84mm
F1.8 - 4.9 vs F2.0-4.9
10FPS vs 8FPS
bounce flash vs touch screen

Innovative Canon 8)

Click to expand...

rrcphoto said:

pokerz said:

To be fair with Canon, let's compare RX 100 (2012) vs G9x2 (2017)
28-100mm vs 28-84mm
F1.8 - 4.9 vs F2.0-4.9
10FPS vs 8FPS
bounce flash vs touch screen

Innovative Canon 8)

Click to expand...

Okay.. the only thing the RX100 has going for it is 1/3 EV at 28mm 28-100 and 1.8 FPS more. I heard lots of complaints about RX100's IS? no?

let's see on the G9X Mark II.

added a touchscreen, wifi/nfc and BLE, UHS-I support, ND filters,etc.

oh and is:

Canon PowerShot G9 X is 4% (3.6 mm) narrower and 0% (0.2 mm) shorter than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II.
Canon PowerShot G9 X is 20% (7.5 mm) thinner than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II.
Canon PowerShot G9 X [209 g] weights 26% (72 grams) less than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II [281 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).

Yeah .. damn that canon for doing something well.

: :

Click to expand...

rrcphoto said:

you're right, camerasize doesn't have the RX100

Canon PowerShot G9 X is 4% (3.6 mm) narrower and 0% (0.2 mm) shorter than Sony Cyber-shot RX100.
Canon PowerShot G9 X is 13% (4.9 mm) thinner than Sony Cyber-shot RX100.
Canon PowerShot G9 X [209 g] weights 13% (31 grams) less than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 [240 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).

Happier? the point still stood.

Against the RX100 II? the RX100 II only had 3.9fps, but had a non touchscreen tilt screen and a hotshoe.

yeah .. that's real innovation there .. right?

Click to expand...

rrcphoto said:

powershot2012 said:

Seriously, you are even trying to put the G9X in the same league as the LX10, let alone the RX100 IV and V???

Now that is funny. :

Click to expand...

reading is hard I see. : :

Click to expand...

powershot2012 said:

Thinking, for others.

Only thing worse than the G9X is the G9X II.

28-84mm F2.0-4.9 End of story. ;D

rrcphoto said:

powershot2012 said:

Seriously, you are even trying to put the G9X in the same league as the LX10, let alone the RX100 IV and V???

Now that is funny. :

Click to expand...

reading is hard I see. : :

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

powershot2012 said:

Thinking, for others.

Only thing worse than the G9X is the G9X II.

28-84mm F2.0-4.9 End of story. ;D

Click to expand...