I was about to argue that most EF-M lenses have IS, but I used an R7 last week and that has an 'auto-level horizon' feature that uses IBIS. That improved my pictures a lot, since I was on a very flat island in a big lake
My M6 II EVF stays on unless I'm transporting it. It's easy to pop it off and drop the camera and a couple of lenses into a tiny sling bag but once I'm taking photos the EVF goes back on and I don't take it off. I kind of wish someone would have reverse engineered the hot shoe and made a 3rd party, higher resolution and larger EVF with an eye cup. I spend most of my time using my hand to cup the EVF to keep light out so I can see.
Doesn't the m50ii have a digital ibis for stills? Or video only? Thought I saw that somewhere recently. Anyway, there's no question, any ibis is better than no ibis, especially for amateurs and travel photography, where you may be in low light situations but on the move and don't wanna be working on your shots and chimping. Personally, I've never found lens IS super effective for stills, but I'm using older EF-S IS lenses, with likely lower (2-3?) stops of compensation. Oddly, the best IS lens I've got is probably the 18-135 nano USM, but I only use it for video lol. It gets so slow, though, maybe it wouldn't matter much for darker settings compared to a 1.8 prime. When we're talking 6 stops of on-sensor IBIS, with up to 8 stops with lens IS, like on some of the Nikon and Olympus cameras... My goodness. Imagine handholding a one second exposure like it was nothing. That's how it should be in consumer grade cameras, IMO. IBIS should not be exclusive to super users. Stop punishing entry level users with learning curves. Just give them a good end use experience, and save money elsewhere.
There are dozens of YT channel creator help videos targeting newbies for the M50, many are well done. Except now if they do discontinue the line completely, and anyone buys it now, they should be warned. I agree all the sensor comparison nonsense isn't for the under $1k buyers. The weather sealing is another consideration, so M50 isn't for all. GoPros address the stabilization issue for many. The M50 is such a cool camera, really might also buy the M62.
I can't recomend the M6-II strongly enough.
Is it much better than the M50ii? I didn't like the non articulated screen but I wanted to get it anyway, but no more stock locally.
2015 I believe was the first M model I think. All the hype over the R10 didn't bring with it APSC lens, it makes no sense to have $996 body and few AF FF Primes those $2000+ lens. I hope they address this RF-S issue and not continue to push for more models without it.
The original M was introduced in 2012 for around €800, I got it in 2013 after Canon heavily discounted it to €250 and released a firmware with much improved AF. That was a few weeks before our honeymoon, the M+22mm was used a lot more than the 7D on that trip.
Small cameras sure are great though. My SD750 is all scratched from keys in my pocket after all the years of usage, now 15 years I guess and one of two batteries hold a charge for quite awhile. Lower res videos though.The original M was introduced in 2012 for around €800, I got it in 2013 after Canon heavily discounted it to €250 and released a firmware with much improved AF. That was a few weeks before our honeymoon, the M+22mm was used a lot more than the 7D on that trip.
The downside of the small size is that it will also fit in a large coffee cup. The Dubai subway has a 'no food or drink visible' policy, so I stupidly put the cup in my bag. That was right before the flight back and travel insurance reimbursed enough to get a replacement body
