I meant by using USB-C PD, not by trying to connect a USB-C cable to the battery when it's in the body. My Hahnel batteries won't charge via USB-C PD.
Upvote
0
It would be better if the battery can charge inside the camera without USB-C but that would be good for older cameras like the EOS R, R5, and R6.I meant by using USB-C PD, not by trying to connect a USB-C cable to the battery when it's in the body. My Hahnel batteries won't charge via USB-C PD.
I bought two LP-E6N on eBay for 10 € and for 15 € Got lucky hereIf I've to save money on batteries I'll buy old E6/E6N used on eBay, you'll likely pay almost the same price of a third party one, but the originals are more reliable and will last waaaaaay longer ("will last longer" is intended both for single charge duration, and for reliability over the years).
On my R6 I use 6 batteries; two are new E6NH, two old E6N (purchased them with the 6D, so 2014, they're 9yo) and two even older E6 from the 5DII period (so I bought them in 2009 or 2010); I don't see any real difference in duration with the new E6NH, the E6/E6N have worst level of recharge performance as per the camera battery indicator, a single red dot, but still works flawlessly.
I recently got 1600/1700 shots per battery at a wedding with the R6 (in SINGLE DRIVE; 1fps...or 1fpp, 1 frame per push) with average 20% of power still left, using the 9yo E6N's (which also demonstrate that ML cameras doesn't "eat on batteries"; it's just people not knowing how to use cameras).
I really don't see why taking the risk of using Chinese sh*tty batteries, that last less and sometimes even expand and/or explode, to save 50/100€ on my 2500€ camera (make 3500€ for those who use an R5), it's plain stupid; it's like buying the last Porsche, AMG or BMW M, and fit them with cheap off-brand tyres to save money.
View attachment 210085
Gotcha... I misunderstood. Thought it was an odd ask at first... but I guess I was taken back by the usb connector on the battery, that's where my mind went.I meant by using USB-C PD, not by trying to connect a USB-C cable to the battery when it's in the body. My Hahnel batteries won't charge via USB-C PD.
The link to the Mathorn site included the following comment: " It is also advisable to consider charging the battery via the USB-C port instead of using the simplest chargers which are not equipped with appropriate protections."I think the Smallrig battery is likely the same product as this (or a Chinese copy thereof): https://mathorn.com/ultimate-batteries/mb-202/ from Poland. I've been using the slightly older Mathorn type: https://mathorn.com/standard-batteries/mb-201/ for nearly half a year now and it's a good product. Being able to charge it via USB-C is convenient when travelling because with a dual USB adapter to mains, a (USB powered) JJC dual charger for two 'ordinary' batteries and a USB-C cable connected to the Mathorn battery - that allows for simultaneous charging of three batteries at the same time with minimal charging hardware to carry along.
Yes, it does. I've used them in an R just fine. You just can't charge them in-camera:
The R received a firmware update that allows in-camera charging.
LP-E6NH absolutely charges inside an EOS R with the 2021 R firmware update.Yes, it does. I've used them in an R just fine. You just can't charge them in-camera:
View attachment 210072
Unfortunately, the cheap chargers can be dangerous and are best avoided as you don't know what their safety features are. USB-C chargers, on the other hand, should be much safer because they interact with what they are charging to deliver the correct current. I bought 3 Neewers that come with a 3-place cradle with a USB-C socket input so I can charge them simultaneously with my 45 watt USB-C Apple MacBook charger.The link to the Mathorn site included the following comment: " It is also advisable to consider charging the battery via the USB-C port instead of using the simplest chargers which are not equipped with appropriate protections."
How would you know which chargers have these protections?
I can well believe that the higher discharge rate of the LP-E6NH could lead to faster AF but do you have any other source for this information and what lenses will focus faster? I can't find anything googling.The Canon LP-E6NH doesn't only improve upon the total mAh capacity of the LP-E6N (2130 vs 1865 mAh), it can also provide greater "on-demand" current. This lets the camera maintain its maximum frame rate in H+ mode longer, and it enables newer lenses (those that can utilize the additional current) to focus faster.
Other batteries advertising similar or higher capacity *might* be able to match the Canon battery's performance when fully charged, but it will decrease faster as they discharge. Just something to be aware of if these factors are important to your photography.
Source: After the R5 and R6 were released, my local pro camera store (Ace Photo in Ashburn, VA) had a couple of regional Canon reps in to talk about the new cameras and capabilities, and they spoke about the LP-E6NH battery differences too (it was webcast because it was during the pandemic).
No and no. The presentation was given by a regional Canon Tech Rep named Heather Krut. She mentioned this when talking about the new LP-E6NH battery.I can well believe that the higher discharge rate of the LP-E6NH could lead to faster AF but do you have any other source for this information and what lenses will focus faster? I can't find anything googling.
OK, I asked ChatGPT. Here are the questions and answers. ChatGPT does hallucinate and get things wrong, so don't take it as gospel.No and no. The presentation was given by a regional Canon Tech Rep named Heather Krut. She mentioned this when talking about the new LP-E6NH battery.
I was actually looking at the same charger - I need a USB-C driven charger to be able to recharge some batteries from a powerbank while hiking so I'm very much in the market. How has it been?Unfortunately, the cheap chargers can be dangerous and are best avoided as you don't know what their safety features are. USB-C chargers, on the other hand, should be much safer because they interact with what they are charging to deliver the correct current. I bought 3 Neewers that come with a 3-place cradle with a USB-C socket input so I can charge them simultaneously with my 45 watt USB-C Apple MacBook charger.
I needed the Apple 45 watt charger to charge 3 simultaneously, the two-output 35 watt that came with my MacBook Air would do only 2 simultaneously.I was actually looking at the same charger - I need a USB-C driven charger to be able to recharge some batteries from a powerbank while hiking so I'm very much in the market. How has it been?
No issues charging original Canon batteries? I just need something that will use usb c so I don’t need to rig something up to get the regular charger working with a usb c power bank.I needed the Apple 45 watt charger to charge 3 simultaneously, the two-output 35 watt that came with my MacBook Air would do only 2 simultaneously.