Could mean more vignetting. We’ll see.Is there any difference IQ-wise or performance-wise associated with the 67mm rather than 72mm thread size (in general)?
Keep it simple for me. Thanks!
Upvote
0
Could mean more vignetting. We’ll see.Is there any difference IQ-wise or performance-wise associated with the 67mm rather than 72mm thread size (in general)?
Keep it simple for me. Thanks!
I wonder if that is the reason for putting in support for rear filters -- two thick front filters results mechanical vignetting?Could mean more vignetting. We’ll see.
Seems to have quite a bit of vignetting and strong barrel distortion, hence forced in camera/DPP corrections. But otherwise the IQ looks great from what I can read. Just make sure to use the profiles.Is there any difference IQ-wise or performance-wise associated with the 67mm rather than 72mm thread size (in general)?
Keep it simple for me. Thanks!
Canon was under pressure to make a 35 and lower cost lenses.It would also make more sense to sell the higher margin lens first (which would be a f/1.2) before launching lower margin products, or at least launching them together.
Yes. Obviously, the loss of 0.45 stops is crippling. At least, f/number stops. Probably less loss in terms of light transmission, the difference between the EF 85/1.2L II and EF 85/1.4L is just 0.1 T-stops, for example. But still crippling.Are you serious?
To be precise... I have admitted that I have indeed pre-ordered oneYes. Obviously, the loss of 0.45 stops is crippling. At least, f/number stops. Probably less loss in terms of light transmission, the difference between the EF 85/1.2L II and EF 85/1.4L is just 0.1 T-stops, for example. But still crippling.
Furthermore, the razor-thin DoF one can achieve with a 35mm lens (when the front element is almost pressing against the subject) will be massively affected by that 0.45 stop loss.
Just another case of Canon’s cripple hammer. Only the suckers will buy the f/1.4 version. Realmenphotographers will hold out for the vastly superior, non-crippled f/1.2 version. Even if only to buy it for their realmenphotographer kids since they’ll be too old to lift it when it finally arrives.
Except we know it’s not crippled. How? Because even @roby17269 said he might buy one!
what F1.4 under 85mm prime has Canon ever made with IS?
IS benefits longer focal lengths more than shorter ones, and it's considerably more difficult to put IS into a small lens - especially the L grade IS. Not to mention I dont' think any of Canon's cini primes have IS either. It adds quite a bit of weight, and depending on the focusing groups (which this lens has 2), it could be damned well near impossible because you need a optical group to shift around that isn't tied to focus AND there's enough room around it for the IS mechanics. Oh and add more money for the creation of the pocket universe to shove all that weight and additional size into.
But you can always get the Sony 35mm F1.4 GM with IS... oh wait.
Mostly agree. Long lenses are heavy and the slightest shake is magnified. Wide lenses shake is not magnified because the subject is far and the relative camera movement is less. BUT, when wide lenses are used with a subject close to the camera, in the foreground, that is where the shake is visible. So IS or IBIS is nice to have.
It's harder to put an IS group in a faster lens. Likely that Canon also considers the target market – buyers of a $1500 35/1.4L are more likely to have a body with IBIS than buyers of a $450 35/1.8.Interesting. How does this relate to the 35 f2 IS (great lil lens) and the the current 85 f2 RF IS in terms of build?
I expect an F/1$1499 for a 35 f1,4 L that is also a new hybrid, that scares me regarding IQ… Is a 1.2 coming?
Exciting lens, probably still out of my budget.
We will miss you so much!A sigma 1/4 would be about 700/800, and still high quality.
With canon, we get the same two choices..very expensive or cheap and blah. I cant wait to get my hands on the s5ii, im so tired of these limited choices.
I just joined! haha Though I was aware of what Canon's pricing is and will be like.A sigma 1/4 would be about 700/800, and still high quality.
With canon, we get the same two choices..very expensive or cheap and blah. I cant wait to get my hands on the s5ii, im so tired of these limited choices.
You know how you sometimes have a rude guest who does nothing but complain about the food and ambience, but still won’t just leave?We will miss you so much!
Fireworks are usually shot at f/8 - f/11 so an f/1.4 lens is not usually needed, but I like the enthusiasm (even if it’s not a lens for me).Maybe have for 4th of July fireworks!