But why would they be so determined to do this ? There must be a good reason. I suspect the mp is going to cause a surprise so it has either to be relatively low or high either side of the current ‘normal’. Maybe it’s ‘low’ mid twenties but has quad pixel ? Or some practical way of increasing the resolution / output size, as pixel shift is pretty compromised as a useful tool.
It’s an interesting question. It also puts into perspective the control Canon has which makes me wonder, in a half conspiratorial moment, how much control they actually have over almost all the rumors.
I'm not sure it's that complicated. They need something new to announce and the price isn't a very good lead paragraph. It would be boring just to confirm everything that's already been announced. like eye-control autofocus and the new sensor design. Having worked in public information for decades, I know that you have to have something new to announce, even if its only something mundane like the resolution. I would not read anything into it other than that.
Oh but where's the fun in that! Imagine all the time we'd have and the unused internet space if we didn't argue incessantly about irrelevancies?
Several women actually won in the ancient Olympics.
Looks like there is a frame or bezel within the viewfinder, so that actual viewfinder may not be that large. Perhaps the bits that are used for eye controlled focus are in the bezel???
Indeed, I’m happy plodding away with my ‘ancient’ 1DX II....I just goes to show how good those cameras are at doing their job and, despite what all the youtubers would have you believe, you don't need a gazillion megapickles and a bazillion frames per second to get the shot
So if the R3 is 45 MP's , is the R1 going to have more MP's and if so where does that leave the rumored high MP camera at?
