A Canon Global Shutter Sensor – Would the next 3 series camera be the place to introduce one?

Same here, despite the R7's sometimes very distorted outputs caused by i'ts slow read-out speed. I mostly shoot 30 fps (wildlife), and there are nearly always keepers in these massive bursts. I only switch to MS when I know I will shoot e.g. smaller birds in flight with fast wing flaps, and the quite loud machine gun like noise of the R7 will not so much disturb. So, if one can use even an R7 frequently with ES for action in the field, this shows that a camera with faster sensor read-out and no global shutter could be in real life a better choice than one with GS and visible losses in IQ. I personally would always prefer better IQ. So I appreciate that Canon is slower with GS than others, but maybe the R3 is a good testbed to introduce new stacked sensor generations.
 
Upvote 0
Same here, despite the R7's sometimes very distorted outputs caused by i'ts slow read-out speed. I mostly shoot 30 fps (wildlife), and there are nearly always keepers in these massive bursts. I only switch to MS when I know I will shoot e.g. smaller birds in flight with fast wing flaps, and the quite loud machine gun like noise of the R7 will not so much disturb. So, if one can use even an R7 frequently with ES for action in the field, this shows that a camera with faster sensor read-out and no global shutter could be in real life a better choice than one with GS and visible losses in IQ. I personally would always prefer better IQ.
I agree. In a new sensor (well, for R5m3) I'd prefer to have a cross-green sensor (like the R1) with 45MP, but I do NOT want to have a Global Shutter if it means losing image quality. I have to say that I'm sooooo happy with only using full electronic shutter on the R5m2 and I wouldn't see much difference if I had a GS instead of it. One day they'll have a great GS without image loss, but that's not today ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
As far as I know, the Z9/Z8 have a protective shutter but not a mechanical shutter for shooting.
I think it would be a great idea. A protective cover when changing lenses would be good..... for other folks. I don't change lenses, ever. My 200-800 is permanently attached If I want to use a different lens (which I do about 1% of the time, I'll just put it on my other backup body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
"Normal sensors with mechanical shutters will disappear as “yesterday’s technology” much like DSLRs did in the past."
DSLRs did not disappear yet, it is far from that if you look at sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
Canon have created this camera linage confusion and only have themselves to blame and the only obvious thing they can do with the R3 linage is to totally re-invent it. Has Canon done this before? Yes...the 5D series was a camera linage that moved from consumer / semi pro to serious pro in a few generations.
I do not see a confusion here.
R3 line, if it stays, may become an "experimental" one IMO, where Canon would test new breakthrough technologies before offering them in R1 series. These technologies can be cost prohibitive to put them in lower range cameras.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I do not see a confusion here.
R3 line, if it stays, may become an "experimental" one IMO, where Canon would test new breakthrough technologies before offering them in R1 series. These technologies can be cost prohibitive to put them in lower range cameras.
All of Canon camera bodies are mules to develop and engineer specific new features, which are then added to the wider feature set. If you remember the AF system from the 1Dx was co-developed with the 5D3, because it required a bigger budget than just one camera could afford.
If the R3 becomes a global shutter mule, I can’t see it being rolled out to more cameras in their range. It would be a niche / dead end camera line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0