Same here, despite the R7's sometimes very distorted outputs caused by i'ts slow read-out speed. I mostly shoot 30 fps (wildlife), and there are nearly always keepers in these massive bursts. I only switch to MS when I know I will shoot e.g. smaller birds in flight with fast wing flaps, and the quite loud machine gun like noise of the R7 will not so much disturb. So, if one can use even an R7 frequently with ES for action in the field, this shows that a camera with faster sensor read-out and no global shutter could be in real life a better choice than one with GS and visible losses in IQ. I personally would always prefer better IQ. So I appreciate that Canon is slower with GS than others, but maybe the R3 is a good testbed to introduce new stacked sensor generations.
Upvote
0