Canon EOS R5 Mark II user feedback and discussion

Based on past experience this time of year with DxO, R5II support will be not come to PL7, but rather will require and upgrade to PL8. Keeping my fingers crossed that they will still add support to PL7 but not counting on it.
Their site is just showing a single page with the promise of something exciting is coming and none of the normal links.
 
Phones tend to use A-GPS, where the A stands for Assisted. So in most cases, they do need cell reception, since the cell tower does the assisting.
Your phone manufacturer might have spent a few more pennies and implemented proper GPS, though.
Not entirely correct, in my experience. AGPS still knows where you just as accurately as normal GPS, and the data is able to be recorded as something like GPX. The problem with AGPS is it uses the internet to render the map within the OS. Its not generally an issue if you use an app which is able to download apps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
First image with R5ii processed with DxO. RF 200-800mm. Out on my bike today when a Kestrel appeared. Just had one shot at 1/500s as I didn't have time to set the camera for BIF before the bird turned. 100% crop.

6L8A2488-DxO_kestrel_flying.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 6 users
Upvote 0
Not entirely correct, in my experience. AGPS still knows where you just as accurately as normal GPS, and the data is able to be recorded as something like GPX. The problem with AGPS is it uses the internet to render the map within the OS. Its not generally an issue if you use an app which is able to download apps.
That’s not what AGPS is, it has nothing to do with maps. See the ‘operation’ section in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_GNSS
 
Upvote 0
That’s not what AGPS is, it has nothing to do with maps. See the ‘operation’ section in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_GNSS
Well in that case, the phones I have (pixel 8 and iPhone 13 Pro) perhaps use both AGPS and have a proper GPS chip inside, because they work with no SIM card or signal at all. I suppose they could be pinging cell towers, and they don’t work with aeroplane mode on. Perhaps they’re just AGPS after all. So thank you for the info, I stand corrected.
I was under the impression I was correct with my first response to you.
 
Upvote 0
Well in that case, the phones I have (pixel 8 and iPhone 13 Pro) perhaps use both AGPS and have a proper GPS chip inside, because they work with no SIM card or signal at all. I suppose they could be pinging cell towers, and they don’t work with aeroplane mode on. Perhaps they’re just AGPS after all. So thank you for the info, I stand corrected.
I was under the impression I was correct with my first response to you.
The below excerpt tends to be how it's actually implemented on most phones

On the other hand, a mobile device with a GPS chipset requires no data connection to capture and process GPS data into a position solution, since it receives data directly from the GPS satellites and is able to calculate a position fix itself. However, the availability of a data connection can provide assistance to improve the performance of the GPS chip on the mobile device.

Even dating back to the old iphone 3g days, GPS did work without a data connection, but it took longer to get a fix.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
The below excerpt tends to be how it's actually implemented on most phones



Even dating back to the old iphone 3g days, GPS did work without a data connection, but it took longer to get a fix.
I've been to place where my A-GPS phone couldn't get a fix, but that has been over 15 years ago, so hopefully things have changed for the better. I can always put the GP-E2 in logging mode, if needed :)
 
Upvote 0
I seem to recall that it was posted that the RFii didn't charge through the USB when turned on. Anyway, it does. Could be useful in many circumstances, including sitting a hide with just one LP-E6P but with a small charging block.

I've posted elsewhere but here for the record, the AF with the RF 200-800mm seems significantly improved for speed and consistency of AF. The AF of the RF 100-500mm is so good on the R5 that improvement wouldn't be noticed in anything I do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
For years I have used the wireless remote RC-6 with my 5D Mk IV, and R5. Just figured out it is not compatible with the 5D MkII. You need a BR-E1 wireless remote. It does offer some additional functionality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0