Logical upgrade path after M6 Mark II

F

Fallingtitan

Dec 27, 2022
5
1
#1
Hello fellas,

I heard the M6 line is going away, so what would be a best next step.

I use my mark II for 4K video and macro video for content creation. Love the camera but wish it's low light performance was better.

What camera body should I be looking into? On youtube it seems everyone says Sony is the best for low light. I put my F stop really high to get all details in a 3D manner when doing macro's so I was wondering if Canon makes a camera that competes well.
 
#2
Well, it's possible (we'll see pre-February according to the latest rumour) that a new R model (the R8) will be announced 'with a new form factor' that may be a video/vlogging replacement for the M6. Hopefully with some complementary lenses. Exciting times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
#3
Low light performance is primarily driven by sensor size, so if you want less noise at a given ISO you should be looking at a FF camera.

You can see that here, where the Canon R6II and Sony a7RV have basically the same DR (and thus the same noise floor), which are better than those same cameras in crop mode, the latter performing similar to the M6II.

68D620C3-F362-4C6C-9EE0-EE18DB75F207.png
 
Upvote 0
#4
neuroanatomist said:
Low light performance is primarily driven by sensor size, so if you want less noise at a given ISO you should be looking at a FF camera.
Click to expand...
For deep DoF macro video role, the lens entrance pupil size is the decisive factor in both DoF and noise with the given object illumination. The sensor size is practically irrelevant as long as the lens can achieve the required DoF.

If one wants to have less noise in this case, they should add more light to the scene.

If it were not video, but stills, focus stacking could help.
 
Upvote 0
#5
Kit. said:
For deep DoF macro video role, the lens entrance pupil size is the decisive factor in both DoF and noise with the given object illumination.
Click to expand...
Given the OP stops down for deeper DoF, adding light to the subject would yield the greatest IQ benefit by enabling lower ISOs to be used. I assume that’s not possible for the OP. I also assume shutter speed is relatively fast because of the relationship to video fps.

The entrance pupil determines the amount of light that reaches the image plane. The sensor size determines how much of that light is collected for the image being captured. Image noise is inversely proportional to the total amount of light collected. A FF sensor will collect more light than an APS-C sensor, because the former samples a larger area of the image plane (obviously, I’m assuming the image circle diameter is not limiting). Collecting more light means less noise in the image.
 
Upvote 0
#6
neuroanatomist said:
The entrance pupil determines the amount of light that reaches the image plane. The sensor size determines how much of that light is collected for the image being captured.
Click to expand...
Given the same field of view (and the scene exposure, of course), the entrance pupil (its absolute dimensions) determines both the total amount of light that reaches the sensor and the resulting DoF. The sensor size (with its light gathering ability) and the focal length of the lens (with its light diluting ability) cancel each other.

It becomes quite obvious once you consider that the lens can only focus the light rays that pass through its entrance pupil.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
#7
Jethro said:
Well, it's possible (we'll see pre-February according to the latest rumour) that a new R model (the R8) will be announced 'with a new form factor' that may be a video/vlogging replacement for the M6. Hopefully with some complementary lenses. Exciting times.
Click to expand...

Ok I'll look into the future R8 for sure. I shoot watches and I do inject a ton of light but its difficult I do gymnastics basically while moving the camera and holding the light to avoid reflections.

Someone told me sony had a back light for the sensor to help with higher f-stops? is this true? Like an internal light that shines on the sensor from the inside of the camera body? or is that not a real thing?

btw I read the responses thanks guys for all the helpful posts.
 
Upvote 0
#8
Fallingtitan said:
Ok I'll look into the future R8 for sure. I shoot watches and I do inject a ton of light but its difficult I do gymnastics basically while moving the camera and holding the light to avoid reflections.

Someone told me sony had a back light for the sensor to help with higher f-stops? is this true? Like an internal light that shines on the sensor from the inside of the camera body? or is that not a real thing?
Click to expand...
Have a look at the main thread (on the front page) on the rumoured R8 - it includes quite a bit of discussion (by those more knowledgable than myself) around back-side illuminated (BSI) and stacked (not the same thing) sensors, and includes some comparisons between Canon and Sony (and Fuji!) bodies. In terms of capturing more light, I have to agree with neuroanatomist above, that the best way to go may be via a FF sensor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
#9
Fallingtitan said:
Hello fellas,

I heard the M6 line is going away, so what would be a best next step.

I use my mark II for 4K video and macro video for content creation. Love the camera but wish it's low light performance was better.

What camera body should I be looking into? On youtube it seems everyone says Sony is the best for low light. I put my F stop really high to get all details in a 3D manner when doing macro's so I was wondering if Canon makes a camera that competes well.
Click to expand...
Do you have any examples online of your macro videos? I’ve been slowly trying to shoot video in between stills of macro subjects and it has proven to be challenging, both the basic video aspect and it being macro.
 
Upvote 0
#16
Fallingtitan said:
Do you think learning to shoot Clog will improve the visuals???
Click to expand...
With my nearly non-existent video experience: When using CLOG3 with the Cinema Gamut colourspace and the LUT from Canon, the footage takes a longer time to start looking horrible when I use the colour board in FCPX :)
Log gives you more headroom in post, but it's no substitute for proper exposure and lighting during filming. With all the metal and glass you're working with, it will likely help with controlling the highlights.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
R6 Mark II feature
Replies
2
Views
4K
ronbyram
R
ucps1985
Why I believe Canon should give a better ending for the DSLR system
Replies
49
Views
12K
AlanF
AlanF
Canon Rumors
Canon officially announces the Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Replies
112
Views
40K
dlee13
dlee13
dcm
Shutter shock on the M6 Mark II
Replies
4
Views
7K
dcm
dcm
D
Thoughts of R6 Owners who "upgraded" from a 5D4 (or similar DSLR, or an RP)?
Replies
21
Views
14K
Aussie shooter
Aussie shooter
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Media
Menu