No mention of EF to RF lens compatibility, which is quite good and not a bad reason for an amateur to start with the lower cost EF gear? No comparison of the 1D bodies and advice for different niches? The entire 1D series has seen use in professional sports photography, when would for instance a 1DX mkII be far preferrable over a 1D mkIV? When would a 5D mkIV be better? I was expecting a bit of a dive into the advantages and disadvantages. It is an interesting topic which is worthy of digging into.
Absolutely.
I have owned every 1 series camera since the EOS-1Ds Mark II.
EOS-1D Mark IV, a terrific camera and got us past the EOS-1D Mark III drama fairly quickly. The issue that may matter? APS-H (1.3 crop). There were no wider angle lenses made for the sensor size and if you want to get wide, the 14mm f/2.8L and 11-24 f/4L are both still on the pricey side.
The EOS-1D X line is a far better choice across the board. That was probably the biggest 1 series jump in capabilities from the EOS-1D Mark IV. The rest of the EOS-1D X series is the usual evolution upgrades. The way Canon somehow finds ways to subtly change things and make them better is pretty wild. Even the EOS R1... so many great changes from the amazing EOS R3. So any EOS-1D X is a great choice.
The EOS-1D X Mark III is the best DSLR ever made. I bet during Black Friday, the Canon USA store will have refurbished inventory for sub $3000, and with a warranty.
One might also consider Canon service end dates.
- EOS-1D Mark IV: Service has ended
- EOS-1D X: Service has ended
- EOS-1D X Mark II: Service ends in 2026
- EOS-1D X Mark III: TBA
- EOS 5D Mark IV: TBA
The EOS 5D Mark IV, do you want something smaller and with higher resolution? It was also a well refinded camera in the 5D series.
So it really comes down to, do you want speed, tank like build quality, intergrated grip? There is no better line of cameras ergonomically out there... sorry Nikon.
I have twice recommended EOS-1D X cameras to "sports dads", and both continue to send me images... they're in love with the cameras and saved a pile of money over RF.
All of the EF 70-200mm f/2.8s are great, even the non-IS version. Skip version III, it costs more than the II and the difference is really only a new paint job.
When I owned Lens Rentals Canada, I owned everything that was on the market at the time (Canon and Nikon)... Canon lens lineup included. Even the 50mm macro! (Great lens for art reproduction... maybe the best ever for 35mm)
I can answer any other queries you may have.