1000mm, 2x Extender on the 100-500mm

The 2X extender gets talked down a lot, but I accidentally created a nice comparison. The lions in the distance were a couple of hundred yards away. But we could not get closer without leaving the road. Prohibited in the car, and dangerous on foot. I shot, then added the 2x and shot again. Both are nice images. Note the animals did not move, nor did I. Both shots are hand held and I shot 1-20 images of each and chose the sharpest.

What interests me is the detail captured in the animals. The original images are below, (downsized to 500 pixels wide.).

500mm
1H7A5070 copy.JPG

1000mm
1H7A5092 copy.JPG





Here is a tight crop on the faces I've upresed the 500mm photo in photoshop to make it the same size.

500mm, doubled in Photoshop:
1H7A5070 copy 2.JPG


1000mm (100-500mm with RF 2X Extender)
1H7A5092 copy 2.JPG

I think the lions are noticeably more detailed. I wish I'd had a 1.4X converter to try as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
There is a thread on extenders on the RF 100-500mm, mainly with charts, where you can see the extra detail from using the 1.4x and 2xTCs. I use the 2xTC on the RF 100-500mm in the wild.

 
Upvote 0